911, Iraq, PNAC , All roads lead to Israel
Some "911 was an inside job" camps like to lay out 4 scenarios. Briefly
they go as follows.
1 Is the official story.
We got caught with our pants down and terrorists did 911. And the wars
in the Middle East are part of the greater war on terrorism.
2 The incompetence excuse
There was information available about the coming attacks but because of
our incompetence we failed to see it. Terrorists attacked the US. And
the wars in the Middle East were based on mistakes (more incompetence)
but now we got to stay.
3 They let it happen
They knew full well about the coming 911 attacks but allowed it to
happen in order to use it as a pretext to go to war with Iraq and
Afghanistan as it was in military and corporate interests (particularly
oil) to do so.
4 They made it happen. (They
meaning just vaguely the Bush Admin)
The Bush government either helped protect the terrorists or simply used
them as patsies, and assisted the plane crashes effects with bombs
placed inside the towers prior to 911. The wars in the Middle East were
about oil.
The 911 was an inside job camps then say the evidence must land you
somewhere between 3 and 4 with more research dropping you firmly on 4.
Let me now throw in a 5th scenario
5 The Neocons Made it happen with the
assistance of a foreign government, the same government where
PNAC was first written, and who we have caught spies from who have been
stealing secrets from us about Iran, and who made up the shadow
government of the OSP which is who cherry picked and fabricated the
lies told about Iraq in order to start the war. The Wars in the middle
east were for separate reasons, Afghanistan was about a few pipelines
as noted but more so about controlling large quantities of un-tapped
uranium (a reason for both the Russian and US invasions) and secondly
for controlling opium as the CIA uses drug money to fund it's off the
book black operations such as the now known massive secret prison
systems, (torture camps and human medical/scientific testing).
Location-wise Afghanistan is coupled with other color coded revolutions
to circle China and Russia with US bases and puppets, (add to that the
lesser known negotiations with Japan to allow nuclear subs into the
Japanese Sea [pointed at China] in exchange for moving troops from
Okinawa to Guam). The main goal however, which the PNAC think tank
states, is to keep the eye on the pie: Iran, which Afghanistan and Iraq
both boarder. The invasion of Iraq was to solve Israel's oil crisis and
stop the threat of a secular Middle East which would become a true
economic player and was a threat to the aggressive state of Israel.
The evidence if it was ALL being stated, especially pertaining to the
war in Iraq, would land you somewhere between scenario 4 and 5 and more
research would land you firmly in 5.
A lot of people have written about and shown the problems with official
911 story. There is the demolition of building number 7,
which the 911 commission didn't even address, there are the firemen's
reports that the fires were almost out, there are numerous reports of
secondary explosions etc. Because it has been said on radio and more so
because people have made films about it, many people can recite the
arguments for the inside job in their sleep. But what has been hidden
from you and the dots which have not been connected in any 911 films is
the Israeli connection. 911 was an inside job which was part of a
larger plan for perpetual war hatched in Israel. 911 and the wars in
the Middle East were carefully planned attacks carried out by a faction
of Zionist Neocons and the Israeli Mossad. I would like to focus more
on who did it rather than just
that it was done.
It's crystal clear that the government's official story like their
stories on everything else, is a complete lie. Who really did 911?
To answer this question one should first ask, who had the power to
cover it up? Who would have the power to censor the media and have
total confidence that they could censor the media given an event this
size? One look at the non-coverage of Israeli's illegal occupation of
Palestine should give you an answer. Nowhere, in the US televised
media, do they even mention that there is an occupation. This massive
conflict, which one would assume would be impossible to conceal, is
totally shielded from the American public. The Occupation is missing
from the news and they purposely paint the distorted picture that
Israel just defends itself from crazy suicide bombers. This is not
something they can hide, or even debate about, the occupation is visible, you can go visit it, and it is widely
covered in media outside the US, but you will never ever hear Israel's
crimes even mentioned. There is no news of the Jewish-Only racial colonies that the US calls
"Settlements" and "Neighborhoods" reported on Fox, ABCNNBCBS which is
really one net work that tells the same stories often in the same
order. I will explain why in the media section.
Also there has been no reporting on the second Israeli spy-ring, none,
zero, and the first spy ring uncovered was yanked from Fox News. Even
though it is an open secret to the rest of the world, in the US there
has been no mention of Israel's secretly built nuclear weapons. The
list goes on... the faction that has nothing to fear from the US media
and who could cover up something as huge as 911 or larger are the
Zionists of Israel and their allies in the US government and press who
all profit through the MIC and investments from fridge element
religious organizations who are rewarded with air-time.
One should also look at the list of congressmen on the AIPAC lobby's "payroll" and then look at the astonishing number who we know had connections the the Zionist
lobbyest and criminal Jack Abramoff. (who is deeply connected to the
Israeli Mossad and 911 as I will show you later).
The second question one should ask, is 'what did 911 serve'? The answer
to that is very simple. The aftermath of 911 led to two different wars,
and we all know how 911 was falsely attached to the justifications for
America's wars. Almost 90%
of US troops in Iraq think that Saddam had a role in 911 and that
the war was revenge for it. That level of total ignorance is
mindblowing. War is of course is good for select businesses and central
banks because they are debt generators. Iraq was not a threat to the
US, they were a threat to Israel, and the same case can be said about
Iran. We know who really wants these wars.
There can be no doubt that the press consciously distorted information
leading up to the wars, and that they never made any clear
pronouncements about how they had been wrong about their lies, with the
Weapons of Mass Destruction myth being a clear stinging example. There
are people in the US who still believe that Iraq had WMDs or that they moved them to Syria lol. If you want to know who planned 911 then a
good place to look would be who do we know planned and then lied about
Iraq? (also who has been lying the most about Iran) Who championed the
disinformation? Where were the lies coming from? And when was this war
really planned and where? The answered to all of those questions are
sadly the same. Israel and American Zionists. And that is a fact we can
prove.
If you want to know who the neocons are that orchestrated 911 then you
should look at some of their other messes. We will start with PNAC and
then jump and work backwards from the War in Iraq to 911.
Some 911 films have even been misleading, mentioning
PNAC without telling the origins and then dropping some big names like
Cheney and Rumsfeld who actually didn't write one word of any of the
PNAC papers. But I will leave that for the disinformation section. Don't get me wrong, those
two guys are the scum of the earth, but let's be clear on who did what.
Cheney had a central role in abetting the Mossad by personally having
the authority to command NORAD moved to his position prior to 911, so
that he could personally make NORAD stand down and assure that the
planes hit their targets. And yes a plane DID hit the pentagon. I don't
want to argue here about that or get accused of dividing the movement,
but you can see that here. This really should not be
where our focus is as we already have much stronger evidence about the
WTC towers. There is no motive to use a missile, why not just drop the
plane? And before you say a pilots could not make that kind of flight,
let me remind you many of the said hijackers were found alive. So that part of the
arguement is pointless. They were never on those planes, they were
flown by remote control.
A lot of people know about PNAC, but very few people have taken a hard
look at its origins. People have also gotten confused between the
actual authors and people who just signed
their letters. Rumsfeld for example is not part of the special in-group
as its chairman William Kristol revealed, irronically on the Colbert report. PNAC was co-authored by the same
people who have been caught lying about the Iraq War's pre-invasion
intelligence. We are talking about only around 25 people who helped
fabricate evidence and pass it off to the president and journalists.
PNAC's ideas and statements stem from Israeli policy papers.
In fact, PNAC's papers were written by the very same people who wrote
Israeli policy papers and hold dual citizenship with Israel. The war in
Iraq and control over energy resources ect is all lined out in Israel's
A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm"
which was written by Richard Perle and Douglas Feith. That is just one
of many papers this little blood for money cabal cranked out. The IASPS
(Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Science) also wrote a
paper called the Afghan
Vortex a year before the invasion. Note also that the US had ships
already in place set to invade before 911. In 1992 Paul Wolfowitz wrote
the Defense Planning Guidance, with his former Student Lewis Libby:
Quote: |
The foreign strategy of the US must
be "unapologetic, idealistic, assertive and well funded. America must
not only be the world's policeman or its sheriff, it must be its beacon
and guide…Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new
rival. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional
defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile
power from dominating a region whose resources would, under
consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power. These
regions include Western Europe, East Asia, the territory of the former
Soviet Union, and Southwest Asia…There are three additional aspects to
this objective: First the U.S must show the leadership necessary to
establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing
potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or
pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests.
Second, in the non-defense areas, we must account sufficiently for the
interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from
challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established
political and economic order. Finally, we must maintain the mechanisms
for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger
regional or global role." |
Paul Wolfowitz, who is now the head of the WTO, (appointed by Bush) was
formerly the Director of Policy Planning in the Defense Department.
Like Perle, he was also a "Scoop" Jackson Democrat and worked for
Jackson in the 70s. Paul was a principle PNAC author and he openly
admitted in Vanity Fair magazine that they settled on WMD as the excuse
to use to get a war with Iraq.
Quote: |
For bureaucratic reasons, we
settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the
one reason everyone could agree on |
-May 2003 Vanity Fair
"we" Settled on WMDs.... who is "we" could it be the Zionist cabal that
had been writing about the desire for a war with Iraq and who set up
the OSP? he is also admitting that they were just
inventing reasons for war to present to the public.
The Weapons of Mass Destruction claim is important because it was the
legal reason for the invasion. If they were complying with UN
resolution 1441 then the US did not have grounds to invade. please go here and listen to my Feb 10th radio
interview which outlines more background on that as well as the
sanctions which helped starve half a million people. Allow that
statistic to sink in. 500,000 people mostly children starved to death.
Can you comprehend the horror of that? It gets worse, but that is an
extra tangent for now.
Paul Wolfowitz presented an open letter to Bill Clinton on January 26, 1998
where the opening lines clearly state the desire to go to war with
Iraq. " Wolfowitz
urged Clinton to recognize a provisional [Iraqi] government headed by
the Iraqi National Congress under Chalabi." Wow sound familiar?
This would is what would later become PNAC's doctrine and US foreign
policy.
Later in 2000 PNAC released what is normally referred to as the
document more of you are familiar with which is commonly but mistakenly
just called "PNAC" and that was PNAC's magnum opus, the paper, "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces and
Resources for a New Century " This is the paper stating the
infamous lines about the need for a New Pearl Harbor... P63 or P51
depending on the pdf you have. The bulk of the document however is
about going to war with Iraq. It reiterates what this same dirty cabal
had written for Israel's Prime Minister (1996) Benjamin Netanyahu.
Now Wolfowitz did not do this on his own, Lewis Libby, Douglas Feith
and Richard Perle and others who have recently resigned and or are or
have been caught up in criminal activity in the past, all took part.
Please see the real list of PNAC's authors
Interestingly, Richard Perle and Wolfowitz both worked as aides to
senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson. In 1970 while working for Jackson (A
Democrat!) Perle was charged with two heinous acts, spying for the
state of Israel and leaking information about the CIA in regards to its
nuclear deterrent program, to Russia. Now keep that in mind because it
is very important. It's the very same things that have happening with
AIPAC and the Plame Affair from under Perle and Feith's offices. Perle
is even part of the tax-exempt Henry Jackson Society.
Perle is the nastiest of the nasty. In my mind he is The worst Neocon
of them all. He has appropriately earned the nickname "The Prince of
Darkness." Perle along with Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, (all three
of them got jobs in the US defense department, Perle and Fieth have had
to resign) authored the Israel's "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
Securing the Realm."
Quote: |
Israel can shape its strategic
environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening,
containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam
Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective
in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria's regional
ambitions. |
-Israel's A Clean Break:A
New Strategy for Securing the Realm by Richard Perle and Douglas Feith.
(under the heading
"Moving to a Traditional Balance of Power Strategy"
Now all of us that pay any attention to facts, know that Iraq had nothing to do with 911, so
just why were we invading them and who cooked up the intellignce to justify it? And who
openly wrote about it before we did it? And who was in the US
Department of Defense creating groups like the OSP? The Zionist Israeli
Firsters that is who. And we have plenty of irrefutable evidence to
prove it. But that's not all, it goes even deeper and gets even more
obvious.
While speaking to Wolf Blitzer from CNN, a former AIPAC employee, Perle
said of Semour Hersh, the Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who exposed
the My Lai massacre of Vietnam and later with the help of Joe Darby,
broke the story about the Abu Ghraib torture scandal, "Sy Hersh is the
closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist, frankly." And
Perle is the author of at least 4 different IASPS papers.
Quote: |
On March 17, 2003, veteran
investigative reporter Seymour Hersh reported in the New Yorker that
Perle used his position as chairman of the DPB to solicit $100 million
for his security-oriented investment firm,-Trireme, which was his own
personal version of the Carlyle Group. But unlike the principals at
Carlyle, who at least had the decency to wait until they left
government service to cash in on their connections, Perle was
attempting to capitalize while still serving as an official advisor to
Secretary of; Defense Donald Rumsfeld. |
-source, 5th paragraph. although, I recommend reading all of it.
Perle helped create The Trireme firm which has tens of millions dollars worth
of investments from Boeing whose board of directors comprises people
like John Biggs, John E. Bryson, Linda Z. Cook, and William M. Daley
who also sit on the BOD of major banks and mass media conglomerates.
For more on that mess see this. Perle was on the Defense Policy Board
Advisory Committee from 1987 to 2004 and his advice was always the
same, build more and upgrade more weapons.
In the run up to the war in Iraq, there was a lot of disinformation.
Once again most people know what the lies were concerning the WMDs, the
Al Qaeda accusations, the mushroom cloud scare tactics, (notice once again
how the neocons chose to have Neo-Condi make that loaded fearmongering
statement with Wolf Blitzer, from CNN, a former AIPAC employee.)
liberating the Kurds, and lastly the joke of democracy building, which
have all been shown to be falsehoods or failures. I picked each of
these reasons apart in my book, but I think by now they should be
pretty self evident.
What people do not seem to know is who
made these fabrications. They assume it was just "Bush" and the vague
term "the administration". Well yes it was people in the
administration, but who? Well let's break it down. AIPAC and the OSP
were the two Zionist faction in the government who spoon fed the lies
about Iraq which Bush was looking for to the administration to justify
an invasion. Lt.
Col. Karen Kwiatkowski explains how military officers' opinions
were dismissed or even punished by the civiliand cabal brought in from
the American Enterprise Institute, (the Parent of PNAC).
Quote: |
...But in fact, my outspokenness
was probably never noticed because civilian professionals and military
officers were largely invisible. We were easily replaceable and
dispensable, not part of the team brought in from the American
Enterprise Institute, the Center for Security Policy, and the
Washington Institute for Near East Affairs |
The Israelis were visiting the DOD without having to sign in and going
straight to Feith's office where the secretive OSP was headed. The same
office Lawrence (Larry) Franklin worked for who was sentenced to 12
years in jail for spying for AIPAC the thug like Israeli lobby, who we
have learned Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) used AIPAC to help
bribe her position as the highest ranking Democrat on the House
Intelligence Committee. And whose aid has been suspended thus far for
leaking leaking the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq to the New
York Times the same paper Libby leaked classified information to
through Judith Miller. Of course another Israeli firster Nancy Pelosi is set to replace
Harman and she has already stated she would block attempts to impeach Bush.
Kwiatkowski continues.
In early winter, an incident occurred that was seared into my memory. A
coworker and I were suddenly directed to go down to the Mall entrance
to pick up some Israeli generals. Post-9/11 rules required one escort
for every three visitors, and there were six or seven of them waiting.
The Navy lieutenant commander and I hustled down. Before we could
apologize for the delay, the leader of the pack surged ahead, his
colleagues in close formation, leaving us to double-time behind the
group as they sped to Undersecretary Feith's office on the fourth
floor. Two thoughts crossed our minds: are we following close enough to
get credit for escorting them, and do they really know where they are
going? We did get credit, and they did know. Once in Feith's waiting
room, the leader continued at speed to Feith's closed door. An alert
secretary saw this coming and had leapt from her desk to block the
door. "Mr. Feith has a visitor. It will only be a few more minutes."
The leader craned his neck to look around the secretary's head as he
demanded, "Who is in there with him?"[/url]
Why were Israeli generals visiting a secretive group in the DOD under
the office of the Clean Break authors (as well as PNAC) Fieth and Perle
where a Spy for the Israeli looby AIPAC was caught spying on the US?
(and trial dates from the rest of it have been bumped up 5 times and
growing daily.)
One of the most important scandals in the administration which is
currently on trial with it's second trial date set for Jan 2007, is the
Plame outing and Niger forgeries. The Plame Affair involves Lewis
Libby, Wolfowitz former student and PNAC author. Libby we discovered
got his orders from higher up. Libby of course was was part of the
Office od Special Plans. Libby's scandal is complex, please see the
above link and listen to my radio interviews 1 and 3 to get into it further.
Lewis "Scooter" Libby was Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff (now resigned
after his indictment (which I predicted long before it happened). He was also a
presidential advisor. Libby was a lawyer for 15 years for the
billionaire "commodities trader" Marc Rich, a fugitive that Bill
Clinton gave a pardon to the last hour he was in Office as
President. Libby is also among the Republican perverts crowd writing
fictional books about underage Japanese girls getting forcefully raped
by a bear in a cage, among other disgusting things I see no point in
repeating. This kind of work actually fit perfectly with his client
Marc Rich if you know about him. That story is rather
interesting and it's in my book, but that's too big a tanget for now.
Seriously, there is something deeply wrong with these people.
UPDATE (we now have the Mark Foley
which is set to widen enormously not in the MSM but on sites like this
one). Abramoff, the Zionist criminal lobbiest, was paying for congressmen's trips to visit the sex slavery
market. We know other high ranking Republicans knew about Mark Foley
for months yet they did nothing. I smell something Much deeper at work
here.
I remember when a man with the same last name, Mick Foley, gave a
speech on RAW where he made a play on the smelt-it-delt-it thing,
saying often those who are yelling the loudest about something are
guilty of it, like Rush Limbaugh ranting about drug use when he was a
pill popper and dealer himself. And how the Chicken Hawks call for war.
Well, this can include Mark Foley (not Mick) as he was the congressman
incharge of writing the laws against pedophiles and missing children!
Before someone points it out, yes, Mick Foley was a professional
wrestler, so what, so was Jesse Ventura. Like comedy channels Wrestling
has actually been a good covert criticsim about politics. Note the NWO
in the wrestling world, or the WWE Debates. People can
scoff at this but I would argue that in today's world of Faux News that
entertainment programs deliver more accurate information than the news
networks most notably Comedy Central's Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert.
(Note that I am not saying any of these entertainers agree or disagree
with me on 911) However when a celebrity speaks out like Charlie Sheen
has, they have their opinion judged based on their profession rather
than on its merits.
Andreas von Bulow the former German Defense Minister said on the Alex
Jones show April 21, 2006 that this false flag operation
[911] had to be carried out by a very small group of people. Alex asked
him 100? 40? He said less than that. Right after the second break (which on the QuickTime
bar would be right in line with Andreas von Bulow's right ear)
Alex talks about the picture getting more clear as the truth about the
wars come out. He then talks about the 25 Neocons who wrote PNAC were
in high positions in the DOD and white house, and Andreas von Bulow
says "sure and part of them wrote the government program for Benjamin
Netanyahu... "(Former Prime Minister of Israel). Alex goes on to say
who could have done this? Bulow says it was not the CIA and Alex jumps
in saying your talking about black ops. Then Alex says we know only a
MAJOR STATE could have carried this out. Andreas says it must have been
done from high up and it had to be done by a few people. Alex says
would you say 100-200, AVB says less, Alex askes 50 people? And AVB
says less. Maybe Alex can not say it was the Zionists on the air. But
he sure was hinting at it.
Well I have just been telling who the Neocons who wrote PNAC and were
embeded in the DOD were. They are the Zionist cabal.
Bush and his merry band of sadistic Zionists would like to blame shift
the responsibility of the WMDs myths to the CIA. Well as evil and
corrupt as the CIA is, it is not that sloppy. Bush did not just get
"mistaken intelligence" or make "miscalculations" he explicitly asked
for fabrications.
Here is the concrete proof that they lied. One of Bush's claims about
Iraq was that Saddam was trying to acquire yellow-cake uranium from
Africa. This rhetoric was further laced in fear by Neo-condelsleeza
Rice saying we could not let the smoking gun be a mushroom cloud. What
outrageous audacity, (they are even re-using the same fear-mongering
excuses to attack Iran) they were dead wrong as George Tenet (head of
the CIA at the time of 911) would later have to admit.
Well the document that Bush based this claim on was a fake! How do we
know? Because the signature on it was forged. How do we know? Because
the forgers put down the wrong person's name. The Foreign minister from
Niger, the country they were claiming Saddam was gathering uranium
from, who supposedly signed it had been out of power since 1989! Allele
Elhadj Habibou was not in power at the time of the supposed signature.
Look here I have the primary documents and a summary.
Quote: |
In a letter from the President of
Niger a reference is made to the constitution of May 12, 1965 -- but
the constitution is dated August 9, 1999;
Another letter purports to be signed by Niger's foreign minister, but
bears the signature of Allele Elhadj Habibou, the minister between
1988-89;
An obsolete letterhead is used, including the wrong symbol for the
presidency, and references to state bodies such as the Supreme Military
Council and the Council for National Reconciliation are incompatible
with the letter's date;
It wasn't until just before the war began that Mohamed El Baradei, IAEA
director-general, told the UN Security Council on March 7 that his team
and 'outside experts', had worked out that ' these documents ... are in
fact not authentic'. |
Now that must be embarrassing. Be nice if the mainstream media would
report that. Now are you ready to get pulled out of the rabbit hole
some more? I will come back to just who forged these documents. (Ahmad
Chalabi , Francis Brookes, Dewey Clarridge, and Michael Ledeen. ) First let's see
how they got into the president's hands. Bush said, these well known
false claims, as if they were true in his State of the Union Address.
It has now been called is infamous 16 words, which he could be
impeached for if we had an
actual opposition party.
The disinformation was stove piped straight to Cheney/Bush by a little
known shadow government called the OSP: the Office of Special Plans,
headed under Cheney and Rumsfeld and a pack of Zionists underlings, yes
the same ones who co-authored PNAC's papers and the Clean Break for
Israel paper.
In an attempt to shut up people who tried to tell the public that the
uranium claim was a lie, and as a means to prevent the CIA from
catching who forged the documents, and as a means to once again
undermine the US's ability to track nuclear weapons thus creating
wiggle room to lie about Iran, a clandestine CIA agent and her front
company BJA was uncovered when journalists from the NY Times and CNN
were purposely slipped information by Cheney's Chief of Staff, Lewis
Libby and Presidential advisor Karl Rove. To unravel all of this please
go
here
We now have Libby admitting
that Bush and Cheney authorized him to leak the information, yet
another offense they could both be impeached for were we to have a
functional Republic. Remember that Libby was also a co-author of PNAC
and worked with Wolfowitz under Cheney in Bush the first's presidency.
Interesting isn't it?
Don't worry it gets worse. Notice that this is something that Richard
Perle got in trouble for in the past. Perle has resigned from his
position in the Department of Defense. He did so just after AIPAC's
headquarters was physically raided by the FBI, how coincidental. What
is AIPAC? Well AIPAC would be Israel's largest lobby. (In reality it is
a Zionist lobby and it does
not benefit Israel per-se, it benefits the MIC). A man working for
Perle in the DOD named Larry Franklin has gotten sentenced to 12 years in jail for passing off top secret
documents to AIPAC who in turn gave them to the Israeli government
through the Israeli embassy in DC. Go read about that scandal here
So Israel has been caught spying on the US again what is new other than the
fact that a foreign government can get caught spying in the US in a
time of war and the Media will not report it. Just imagine if it had
been Iranian spies instead of Jews, and how big this story would be.
Also imagine that were attacking Iran's enemies and were following a
war plan written off of Iranian policy papers and a disproportionate
number of the authors were all Iranian Americans who were still in
government and had dual citizenship to Iran. Ha ha not a chance but you
see Israel can get away with it because Israel is a cash cow for the
Military-Industrial-Complex.
Corporations have obviously profiteered from the wars, that should be
clear to captain obvious. But did they write, implement, and use
deception, to start this war or was that the Zionists? Who got caught
spying on the US, Halliburton or Israel? Israel that is who. The
profiteering is a by product of the war as in any war. They are all in
bed together because of overlapping interests between the military
related corporations and the Zionists. Zionism which allows a standing
army to invade Palestine in order to protect illegal racil colonies of
religious fanatics who think GOD gave them the land they bulldozed and
shot children for in order to steal it...
However, just how the Hell do they get away with it? Well they are free
from any and all criticism because they play the two cards which an
over-socialized liberal can not see through. They play the race card
and the religion card, a double whammy. If you say the J word it is
over, even if Israel has an illegal military occupation and sets up
racially segregated colonies into Palestine, kills kids, knocks down
homes of civilians and attacks them with a military and runs a brutal
police state which is causing a backlash of terrorism on Israeli
people. The Zionists are the real racist, engaging in ethnic cleansing
in the name of defense and calling any
opposition terrorists. They are creating terrorism by engaging in it
themselves. Video
link Israel can do ANYTHING and the press will not mention. But
then again just who owns our press and our banks?...
One of the arguements that poeple express or at least struggle with,
who do not believe 911 was an inside job, is the question of the media.
They cannot believe that no one in the media would talk about it. Well
Anyone who knows jack about the Israeli Palestine conflict knows how
much the US media, lies, distorts, and omits information in order to
push the Zionists' aims.
This site has this video up in the "best of section," I highly
recommend seeing "Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land" to learn
more about the relationships between Israel and the US media. Visit our
video section and watch all those films. For the record Google has reset this
counter on this video many times. It was number 31 with millions views
now down to 700,000 plus.
What people need to realize is what
is behind the Media.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MEDIA
Well the major networks are all owned by different corporations.
These corporations have vested interest in the largest umbrella
corporation on earth, the Military industrial complex, or one might say
the industries involved in weapons manufacturing, reconstruction,
energy, ect everything that has a pay check tied to the allocation of
money to the military. Corporations have "Boards of Directors." However
the same people may serve on multiple "Board of Directors" for
different corporations, and they do as I will explain.
For Example CBS is owned by Viacom so is MTV, VH1, and
Nickelodeon. It's not just the news but the sitcoms and such as well
that are part of the propaganda. Viacom is owned by Sumner Redstone.
(originally Murray Rothstein) CNN is owned by AOl-TimeWarner. Warner Brothers is owned by Gerald
Levin. ABC is owned by Disney. Disney is owned by
Michael Eisner. Fox
is owned by the Rupert Murdoch News Corporation. MSNBC
is obviously influenced by Microsoft who holds 18% of the company but
it was founded by none other than the corporate welfare sucking G.E.
(who is deeply invested in the Israeli occupation).
Members of the Board of Directors of these corporations sit on the BOD
of the weapons manufactures and mega companies like Texaco, Chevron,
Boeing, Lockheed, Citigroup, Rockwell Automation, Chase, Worldcom, JP
Morgan, Haliburton etc.
Some are even in the government. For Example Chevron/Texco merged with Unocal who got the largest and first
no-bid contracts from Afghanistan. The Secretary of State Condoleeza
Rice, was on the Board of Directors for Chevron/Texaco.
They even named an oil tanker after her.
Lets look at some of this mess.
BOEING
John H. Biggs sits on the board of directors for
both Boeing and JP Morgan & Chase. How nice to direct both a
company and two banks. John E. Bryson is on the BOD with Boeing and also
He is a director of The Walt Disney Company, who owns ABC. Linda Z. Cook the CEO of Shell is also on the BOD
of Boeing.
more on boeing here disgusting isn't it.
Lockheed
Lockheed is comprised of mainly ex-military and x-government employees
in the defense industry. They got caught in the 70s financing the
right-wing party the LDP in Japan who has open connections ot the
Yakuza the Mafia times 100. Check out the Kodama Lackheed incident.
("Rokkeido jiken") They paid this mobster Kodama of the Kanto-kai and
ties to the Yamaguchi-gume Yakuza wing (the largest one) 2 million in
1976 dollars to swing contracts for Lockheed. Lockheed's president at
the time Carl Kotchian was forced to report in detail the companies
long history secret payments to Kodama. It's a well known scandal in
Japan as it was so disgraceful that 1)the Japanese government is full
of mafia and 2) they got money from the very same company that built
the planes that dropped the atomic bombs on Japan.
more here This was Japan's Watergate. But you wont
hear about it in any statndard history text books. Lockheed was busted
vribing the Prime minister (Kakuei Tanaka) both the ministries of
transportation and industry as well as setting up a $50,000 kickback to
the president of All Nippon Airways for each plane sold. -*
Dick (45 million in Halliburton) Cheney's wife was on the BOD of
Lockheed until 2001! Unbelievable, and Lockheed for the past 7 years in
a row has gotten the largest government contracts normally tens of
billions. Here is a list from 2005 back to 2000. As you can see Boein
is in second every year.
Top 20 Defense contracts
for 2005
1 Lockheed Martin Corp. $20 billion
2 Boeing Co. 18.8 billion
3 Northrop Grumman Corp. 13.7 billion
4 General Dynamics Corp. 11.1 billion
5 Raytheon Co. 9.4 billion
6 Halliburton Co. 5.9 billion
7 United Technologies Corp. 4.9 billion
8 L-3 Communications Holdings 4.8 billion
9 Carlyle Group 2.7 billion
10 SAIC 2.7 billion
11 BAE Systems 2.6 billion
12 General Electric Co. 2.5 billion
13 Computer Sciences Corp. 2.4 billion
14 Humana Inc. 2.2 billion
15 Textron Inc. 2.1 billion
16 Occupational Health Services 2 billion
17 ITT Industries 1.9 billion
18 Triwest Healthcare Alliance Co. 1.8 billion
19 URS Corp. 1.5 Billion
20 Bechtel Group Inc. 1.5 billion
Top 20 defense contracts
for 2004
Lockheed Martin Corporation $20,690,912,117
The Boeing Company $17,066,412,718
Northrup Grumman Corporation $11,894,090,277
General Dynamics Corporation $9,563,280,236
Raytheon Company $8,472,813,918
Halliburton Company $7,996,793,706
United Technologies Corporation $5,056,937,646
Science Applications International $2,450,781,108
Computer Sciences Corporation $2,390,806,128
Humana, INC $2,372,078,226
L-3 Communications Holding, INC $2,260,292,852
BAE Systems PLC $2,192,647,377
Health Net, INC $1,899,824,940
General Electric Company, INC $1,822,720,199
Bechtel Group, INC $1,742,470,267
Bell Boeing Joint Program $1,539,815,440
ITT Industries, INC $1,539,742,075
Electronic Data Systems Corp $1,538,272,307
Honeywell International, INC $1,462,914,723
Carlyle Group $1,442,680,416
Top 10 defense contracts
in 2002 before the Iraq war.
1 Lockheed Martin Corp. $17.0 billion
2 Boeing Co. $16.6 billion
3 Northrop Grumman Corp. $8.7 billion
4 Raytheon Co. $7.0 billion
5 General Dynamics Corp. $7.0 billion
6 United Technologies Corp. $3.6 billion
7 Science Applications International Corp. $2.1 billion
8 TRW Inc. $2.0 billion
9 Health Net, Inc. $1.7 billion
10L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. $1.7 billion
2001
1 15. Billion Lockheed Martin Corp. 15,130,223,000
2 13. Billion Boeing Co. 13,595,338,000
3 11. Billion Northrop Grumman Corp. 11,122,116,000
4 5.8 Billion Raytheon Co. 5,875,142,000
5 5.5 Billion General Dynamics Corp. 5,213,835,000
6 3.6 Billion United Technologies Corp. 3,678,345 ,000
7 1.9 Billion TRW Inc. 1,970,383,000
8 1.7 Billion SAIC 1,774,863,000
9 1.6 Billion General Electric Co. 1,682,903,000
10 1.4 Billion Carlyle Group 1,413,968,000
As you can See every Year Lockheen Martain is at the top by a large gap
followed by Boeing and Northrup Grumman Corporation. Notice that
Carlyle and General Electric and Halliburton are in there as well. We
are giving them BILLIONS, actually tens of Billions Almost as much as
what Churches send to Israel. Please now read this
I got these figures from their own fricking websites. Go ahead and comb
them with a fine tooth comb. These are not secrets. This is right out
in the open. These are not secret societies, these are companies in the
MIC who profiteer from war and who own our mass media.
Lets look at number 3 Northop Grumman Corp.
They also have a hand in glove relationship with the government. They
have been in the government.
Vic Fazio
Senior Advisor at Northrop
Quote: |
"Vic Fazio served as a Member of
Congress for 20 years representing California's third congressional
district. During that time, he served as a member of the Armed
Services, Budget and Ethics Committees and was a member of the House
Appropriations Committee where he served as Subcommittee Chair or
ranking member for 18 years |
source
Kevin Sharner and Philip Frost both on the BOD at Northrop are or have
been on the BOD of major Pharmaceutical companies.
It just gets more nasty the more you look
I will let you look up the rest on your own. Just grab some of the
names from these list and look at their BODs. Needless to say they are
all one happy corporate killing family. Nothing makes them more money
than warfare. And nothing is currently a larger cash cow than the
Zionist occupation of Palestine which also has the financing of super
right wing Christian churches who get the benefit of air time from the
networks for preaching the message that is best for the warmongers and
investing their money into their stocks. More on that whole mess and
the iron triangle etc here
Multi-national corporations run our press and government. They tie back
to the privately owned central banks. long story short the MSM is full
of shit.
Wanna to see more on the MIC?
Defense spending
Our senate voted on the new bill for Defense spending 100 for and 0
against it. That's 100% for giving more money to the MIC and ZERO
opposition.
some interesting parts
(Sec. 8024) Authorizes DOD to incur obligations of up to $350 million
for DOD military compensation, construction projects, and supplies and
services in anticipation of receipts of contributions from the
government of Kuwait. -source
(Sec. 8082) Earmarks specified RDT&E funds for producing Arrow
missile components in the United States and Arrow missile components
and missiles in Israel to meet Israel's
defense requirements. - source
There was this Amendment, but it got rejected.
S.AMDT.4875 to H.R.5631 To increase by $200,000,000 the amount
appropriated or otherwise made available by title IX for the purpose of
supplying needed humanitarian assistance to the innocent Lebanese and
Israeli civilians who have been affected by the hostilities between
Hezbollah and the Government of Israel.
8/3/2006 Amendment SA 4875 ruled out of order by the chair -source click Amendments and go to the very bottom
of the page.
They can spend money to build missile but not to help civilians wounded
or left homeless by missiles Israel used of a civilian population in
Lebanon. The Amendment said SIraeli and Lebanese civilians the problem
being Lebanon had 2.5 billion damages and Israel specifically targeted
civilian areas where as Hezbollah didn't.
And nothing is covered with more of a bias than the occupation of
Palestine. THE KEY ISSUE. watch a long film on that here or a short film here
911 was a spring board for these on going wars. You already know why
the press wont touch it. So WHO do you think took part in 911???
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's jump back to Iraq. The media has not covered crucial aspect of
the war in Iraq either. The telivized press still has not mentioned
AIPAC's spy ring yet they have reported outright lies about Iraq and
Iran. There has also been no mention of the Niger Forgeries or the
deeper aspects of the Plame affair that being why Bush ordered her
ousted and how did Jeff Gannon (male hooker working for a fake news
agency) make referrence to internal government memos about it?! Where
is the US press that could simply explain in one sentence that the wall
Israel is building is not even on their boarder but cuts into
Palestine? Where was the US's coverage of the mk77 dropped all over
Fallujah? How about the obvious theatre like production of the toppling of the Saddam statue in
Iraq that British press could report in the same language and yet the
Majority of Americans remain blissfully in the dark about it. There
have been so many lies, not just about war....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ATTA story is a smoking gun.
Answering some common
questions.
Here is a question you may have asked yourself. If 911 was an inside
job (and I believe it was) then why was there so much prior knowledge
of the attacks? Granted it was ignored, but how could there be
intelligence of an Al Qaeda ring in the US and all those pilots going
to flight schools and the warning about Bin Laden wanted to attack
America if the said hijackers didn't do it (which is evident by some of
them still being alive) ?
Why risk them getting busted if they were patsies? Since the hijackers
didn't do it how was there any evidence of them planning an attack that
they didn't do and obviously didn't even know about considering they
were going to get the blame?
Furthermore if the government really did 911 then why leak information
about your own patsies and look like incompetent fools when the
warnings were ignored?
The prior knowledge arguments have evidence. They do two things. They
make the Bush administration look incompetent for not acting on
supplied information but it also looks like the attacks could have been
prevented had Bush and co only read the memos they were being given.
What that does is make it appear like the attack was done by Arab
terrorists. The Democrats naturally jumped all over this a chance to
make Republicans look bad yet still blame 911 of Arab terrorists.
Someone was dropping hints and information to imply that the terrorists
were Arabs and mainly from Saudi Arabia. Why did they frame Saudi
Arabia if it was a frame and they were patsies then why not use at
least one Iraqi after all that is who they wanted to attack and did
attack after 911. Why Saudi Arabia?
The answer is clear when you understand who really caried out 911. The
Israeli Mossad and their neocon moles and the blackmail controlled
shills.
OK so let's put some facts together. Someone obviously wanted to pin
the 911 terrorists attacks on Muslim Arabs.
One of
the most laughable parts of the 911 story was the FBI finding Atta's
unburned passport at ground zero. What a crock. Atta's pass port
had been reported stolen in 1999 magically that missing and stolen pas
port is the same one that was found at ground zero. Geee someone must
have put it there for the FBI to find in order to implicate Muslim Arab
terrorists.
Who could that be? Who got caught on 911 in a white van that had traces
of explosives in it and worked for a moving company which turned out to
be a front for the Israeli Mossad? 5 Israeli agents got caught and the
first thing out of their mouths was
Quote: |
"We
are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems.
The Palestinians are your problem." |
Gosh an English speaking x-military explosives expert cheering and
taking pictures of the WTC burning towers in in NY on 911 who worked
for a fake moving company in the Mossad driving a van that had a hit
with bomb sniffing dogs and over 4 thousand dollars stuffed in a sock
is nothing to be concerned about. Sivan Kurzberg could still say with a
straight face. "It wasn't me, blame the Palestinians."
Shortly after 911 we had two different Anthrax letters trying to blame
911 on the Arabs. One read
Quote: |
"You cannot stop us. We have this
anthrax. You die now. Are you afraid? Death to America. Death to
Israel. Allah is great." |
and the other read
Quote: |
This is next. Take Penacilin now.
Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great." |
Death to America and Death to Israel. Gee, I wonder who really wrote
it? Might it be Israel?
Rudi Dekkers was Atta's or someone pretending to be Atta's flight
instructor in Florida. Note that we know the The Israeli Mossad wa
sliving next door to Atta in Florida (supposedly monitoring him).
Now Rudi Dekkers discovered that Atta could not speak German. Mohamed
Atta lived in Hamburg Germany yet suddenly he must have forgotten ohw
to speak German. Dekkers a Dutch citizen tried to converse with Atta
who stared at him and had to ignore him eventually leaving for Boston.
Quote: |
This is eerily similar to the way
in which Zacharias Moussaoui (the so-called "20th hijacker") became
"belligerent" when his Minnesota flight instructor tried to speak to
him in French (his first language), at the beginning of that course.
The Minnessota Star Tribune reported on December 21, 2001: also here |
"The real Atta would have been able to respond to his instructor's
German small talk and the real Moussaoui would have been able to
respond to his instructor's French small talk." quoted
from here
Well SOMEBODY was trying to create information about Arab Hijackers
training for 911. SOMEBODY was living next to their partner Atta
framer. No wonder Atta was seen so many times on the casino ships with
Jack Abarmoff. He was not Atta he was the Mossad's own boy. They killed
the eal Atta.
SOMEBODY left his passport at ground zero and then somebody wrote
letters for the anthrax attacks steering Americas rage onti Israel's
enemies.
Back to the Saudi question. So why there? To understand this one would
have to be aware of the foiled Mossad plot in Mexico. To be breif the
OIl rich Mexico was being set up to ally with the US by way of another
false flag operation. But the polt was foiled and the Israelis busted
with Hand grenades and TNT. I really encourage you to get my book
Welcome to the USSA. Cut oil off from the Sauds.... Blame the Anthrax
attacks on an Egyptian... invent false Al Qaeda connections with
Iraq... say Osama is in Afghanistan.... cook up lies about Iran having
nukes or making peole wear yellow satrs... Someone is not at war with
terrorists but with Israel's enemies. We KNOW they lied about Iraq. I
assure you Bin Laden is already dead. And We know they are lying about
911.
The question no longer remains who did it? We know the specific names.
We know who made the OSP and wrote PNAC who put the bombs in the towers
and when and I gave a good theory as to why and how it was covered up
by showing how the press works.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOW THE OIL
You can see from the partical list I made of government contracts and
Boards of directors, how the scam works between the MIC, Media
conglomerates, and the banks. They profit from lying to you. Always
follow the money and the motives. And in this day and age, follow the
oil too.
The first proposed oil pipeline to be opened in Iraq was set to go to
Tel Aviv Israel. Here is where they planned it ten days before the
end of the war. And here is where they planned setting up another oil
pipeline to Israel, this one going to Haifa. And they now pump oil from
Mosul to Hiafa Golly gee, that is interesting why
was all the oil planned to go to Israel?
Oh it gets worse. The US sends oil to Israel from Iraq then buys it from Israel.
Quote: |
One of Israel's largest oil
marketing firms has won a multi-million dollar tender to supply fuel to
US troops in Iraq. According to a IsraelNationalNews.com report, the
tender awarded to Sonol gasoline company, along with its foreign
partner Morgantown International, is valued at $70-80 million. The
company is expected to supply the US forces with 25 million litres of
fuel each month. The tender was issued by the US-based KDR Company, a
subsidiary of Halliburton, which has been entrusted with the majority
of US military contracts in Iraq |
source
Israel takes US aid and buys oil from Iraq at 20% less than the cost it
gets it from Russia and then sells it to the US and is also awarded
contracts by the US government.
Well Israel did have an oil problem.
Quote: |
According to the Energy Information
Administration (EIA), a statistical agency of the US Department of
Energy, Israel produces almost no oil and imports nearly all its oil
needs (around 237,000 barrels a day in 2002). Traditionally, major oil
import sources have included Egypt, the North Sea, West Africa and
Mexico |
Quote: |
Information provided by the EIA
states that in April 2003, there was some discussion of "reopening" the
old oil pipeline from Mosul in Northern Iraq to the Israeli port of
Haifa on its northern Mediterranean coast.
The line, which was built in the 1930s, carried 100,000 barrels a day
at its peak, but has been closed since Israel's establishment in 1948.
The reopening of this pipeline is, on the other hand, reported as being
able to "solve Israel's energy crisis at a stroke".
|
Source
But that is not all. They took oil from Kirkuk where 40% of Iraq's oil
is and Hafar al Batin, Al Basrah (Basara) and Mosul too. Here is a map
of where Iraq's oil is going.
It's a war for oil the left shouts. "No blood for oil" they say. Yeh
that's true, 'no blood for oil' going to Israel, while our own gas
prices rise.
The neocons have failed manything because of hubris, they failed in
Lebanon, they are failing in Iraq. They would like nothing more than to
Balkanize Iraq into three sections with a Kurdistan in the North but
instead they just have a messy low impact guerilla civil war. The
cheers and flowers never came despite the massive propaganda.
Now 911. Back in Feb 2001 the US and UK attacked Iraq with much
public Backlash. Bush bombed Baghdad just two weeks after being sworn
in to office. He tried to start PNAC's plan then but the public was not
having it. They needed that New Pearl Harbor event that PNAC said would
be necessary.
They rigged it with the Mossad's help on 911.
here is how we know
Note the 5 dancing Israelis who had bomb sniffing dogs reacting to
their van and who worked for a Mossad front, a fake moving company in
NJ whose owner skipped town right after 911 and fled to Israel. Note
that they all failed polygraph tests and were all x-military and oh
geee explosive experts.
Note the following bogus Anthrax attacks which said "DEATH TO AMERICA
DEATH TO ISRAEL" This was a huge story for a few day, long enough to
pass the PATRIOT Act and then simultaneously it disappeared from all
the News Networks over night. What a media coincidence huh? Putting it
all together is easy. If 911 was an inside job and not the work of Al
Qaeda (but patsies) then the anthrax didn't come from Al Qaeda either.
I wonder who sent it? I wonder where it came from? They basically named
themselves in the classic Owellian double speak. America and Israel.
These things are not mentioned in 911 video alt radio and of course not
on TV. Zionism is THE most sacred subject in the US. One mention of it
and you are automatically and Anti-Semite. Well it is time to grow some
balls and start talking about the Elephant in the room. Neocons from
Israel and America started these wars and carried out 911. That's the
real 911 Truth.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Information 100% proof Atta had a double
Red this summation of the how Atta
was framed by the Mossad . Atta
could not have been in two places at once, this just confirms my
prior theory.
New Information Press caught in a huge lie about another Hijacker.
Ziad Al Jarrah was recently (October 2006) shown in a video tape dated
2000-2001 with a full beard yet we have pictures of him all through out
the same year clean shaven.
The MIC overlaps with the Zionism as half the CFRs are PNAC authors and
all Jewish Zionist. The reason being Jewish matters is that for some
kooky reason just by having that religion (which is really an ethnicity
in disguise,) one can have dual citizenship to Israel. Oh zionism is
not a faith, (not that I think religions are too grand to begin with)
Zionism is one version of one prophecy or one brand of one religion. If
"legal Jewishness" was a religion then why the concept of bloodlines?
You have to prove you are "Jewish" by ancestry to pass and that allows
one to have dual citizenship with another country and government,
Israel. Apparently this "religion" is genetically inherited muct like a
race. Thus the ZIonists put the interests of a foreign government above
the US.
Continue next post, it is two posts because of the length.
_________________
AIPAC must register as the agent
of a foreign power.
Get my book today!
myspace.com/rys2sense
Last edited by Ry on Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:45 am; edited 27 times in
total |
|