Olmert ad Abbas: noi lasceremo la
Cisgiordania se voi riprenderete Gaza
Il primo ministro israeliano Olmert ha
presentato al presidente palestinese Abbas un piano per il ritiro dalla
Cisgiordania, attuabile solo dopo che l'Autorità Palestinese
abbia ripreso il controllo della striscia di Gaza.
Il piano prevede in pratica il
mantenimento di tutti gli insediamenti, poiché la
demarcazione dei confini seguirebbe il percorso del Muro
dell'Apartheid, ma ai Palestinesi sarebbe concesso il corridoio di
accesso tra Cisgiordania e Gaza. Che generosità!
L'altra Lombardia - SU LA TESTA
agosto 2008
Olmert to PA: We'll quit West Bank when you retakeGaza
By AlufBenn,
Haaretz Correspondent
Prime Minister Ehud
Olmerthas presented Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas with aproposal
for an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank, totake place after Abbas'
forces have retaken Gaza, as part of an agreement in principle on
borders, refugees andsecurity arrangements between Israel and a
futurePalestinian state.
Olmert, who met with Abbas this week, feels thereis
time to reach an agreement during his remaining time inoffice. He is
now awaiting a decision from the Palestinians.
The centerpiece of Olmert'sdetailed proposal is the
suggested permanent border, whichwould be based on an Israeli
withdrawal from most of theWest Bank. In return for the land retained
by Israel in the West Bank, the Palestinians would receive alternative
landin the Negev, adjacent to the Gaza Strip. The Palestinianswould
also enjoy free passage between Gaza and the WestBank without any
security checks, the proposal says.
A senior Israeli official said the Palestinians
weregiven preliminary maps of the proposed borders.
Under Olmert's offer, Israelwould keep 7 percent of
the West Bank, while the Palestinians would receive territory
equivalent to 5.5percent of West Bank. Israel views the passage between
Gazaand the West Bank as compensating for this difference:Though it
would officially remain in Israeli hands, it wouldconnect the two
halves of the Palestinian state - aconnection the Palestinians did not
enjoy before 1967, whenthe Gaza Strip was under Egyptian control and
the West Bankwas part of Jordan.
The landto be annexed to Israel would include the
large settlementblocs, and the border would be similar to the present
routeof the separation fence. Israel would keep Ma'aleh Adumim,Gush
Etzion, the settlements surrounding Jerusalem and someland in the
northern West Bank adjacent to Isra el.
Since Olmert and DefenseMinister Ehud Barak recently
approved more construction in both Efrat and Ariel, two settlements
relatively far fromthe 1949 armistice lines, it is reasonable to assume
thatOlmert wants to include these settlements in the territoryannexed
to Israel as well.
Olmert's proposal states that once a border isagreed
upon, Israel would be able to build freely in thesettlement blocs to be
annexed.
The settlements outside the new border would be
evacuated in two stages. First, after the agreement inprinciple is
signed, the cabinet would initiate legislationto compensate settlers
who voluntarily relocate withinIsrael or to settlement blocs slated to
be annexed. Over thepast few months, Olmert has approved construction
ofthousands of housing units in these settlement blocs,mostly around
Jerusalem, and some are intended for thevoluntary evacuees.
In thesec ond stage, once the Palestinians complete a
series ofinternal reforms and are capable of carrying out the
entireagreement, Israel would remove any settlers remaining eastof the
new border.
Olmertwill to try to sell the deal to the Israeli
public based ona staged program of implementation. The
presentnegotiations, which started with the Annapolis Summit inNovember
2007, are intended to reach a "shelf agreement"that would lay the
foundations of a Palestinian state.However, implementation of the shelf
agreement would be postponed until the Palestinian Authority is capable
ofcarrying out its part of the deal.
Olmert's proposal for a land swap introduces anew
stage in the arrangement: Israel would immediatelyreceive the
settlement blocs, but the land to betransferred to the Palestinians and
the free passagebetween Gaza and the West Bank would only be delivered
afterthe PA retakes control of the Gaza Strip. In this way,Olmert could
tell the Israeli public that Israel isreceiving 7 percent of the West
Bank and an agreed-upon border, while the Israeli concessions will be
postponeduntil Hamas rule in Gaza has ended.
Abbas, for his part, could tell his people thathe has
succeeded in obtaining 98 percent of the West Bankfrom Israel, along
with a promise to remove all settlersover the border.
ThePalestinians' proposal had talked about a much
smaller landswap, of about 2 percent of the West Bank.
Compared to previous Israeli-Palestiniannegotiations,
the Olmert proposal falls between the onethen prime minister Barak
presented to Yasser Arafat atCamp David in July 2000 and the one he
offered at Taba inJanuary 2001. The Palestinian proposal is similar to
theones offered during the Arafat years, which would haveallowed Israel
to annex only a few settlements, along withtheir access roads - a
proposal nicknamed "balloons andstrings." All these Palestinian
proposals ruled outallowing Israel to retain the settlement blocs.
Since then, however, theseparation fence has been
built in the West Bank, and a newphysical reality has been created in
the areas where thefence has been completed.
Israel also presented the Palestinians with adetailed
model of new security arrangements under theproposed agreement. The
security proposal was drawn up by ateam headed by Maj. Gen. Ido
Nehoshtan, now commander of theIsrael Air Force, but previously head of
the army's Plansand Policy Directorate. The proposal has also been
passedon to the Americans, in an effort to obtain their supportfor
Israel's position during the negotiations.
The security proposalincludes a demand that the
Palestinian state bedemilitarized and without an army. The
Palestinians, incontrast, are demanding that their security forces
becapable of defending against "outside threats," an Israeli official
said.
On the refugeeissue, Olmert's proposal rejects a
Palestinian "right ofreturn" and states that the refugees may only
return to thePalestinian state, other than exceptional cases in which
refugees would be allowed into Israel for familyreunification.
Nevertheless, the proposal includes adetailed and complex formula for
solving the refugee problem. Olmert has agreed with Abbas that the
negotiationsover Jerusalem will be postponed. In doing so, he gave into
the Shas Party's threats that it would leave thecoalition if Jerusalem
were put on the negotiating table.
Olmert views reaching anagreement with the
Palestinians as extrem ely important.Such an agreement would entrench
the two-state solution inthe international community's consciousness,
along with a detailed framework for achieving this solution. In
Olmert'sopinion, this is the only way Israel can rebuff challengesto
its legitimacy and avoid calls for a "one-statesolution." Such an
agreement would show that Israel is notinterested in controlling the
territories, or thePalestinians, over the long run, but only until
conditionsarise that enable the establishment of a Palestinian state.
This position has received strong support from the presentU.S.
administration.
Nextweek, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will
visit theregion to continue her efforts to advance the negotiations.
However, Olmert opposes her proposal to publish a
jointU.S.-Palestinian-Israeli announcement detailing progress inthe
negotiations since Annapolis. Olmert objects topublishing partial
positions; he only wants to announce acomplete agreement - if one can
bere ached.